A friend linked me to this, describing (possible) Nintendo Revolution details. The big idea is to replace the standard D-Pad+Buttons combination we’ve all known since the dawn of time with a touchscreen controller. Game designers could render any number of different screen elements, buttons, widgets, sliders, etc., depending on the game.
First of all, this is just a rumor. But if it turns out to be true, and I think it’s probable, I don’t think this is a bad idea at all, and it makes it absolutely clear that Nintendo is serious about pushing the envelope. Just like with the DS, I can’t wait to see what some developers will bring to it, especially in 2nd (and +) generations of games.
I think it’s also clear that this could make or break the company, at least in its role as a contender in the next-gen console producer space. Business-wise, Sony and Microsoft have seen that, at least for the time being, people buy incremental graphics improvements. Tell them it has 10 million more polygons than PSn-1, and they’ll buy. Tell them it has support for HD output, and they’ll buy. Nintendo seems to have the great ideas, new ideas, but no one spends the cash on them. That’s how you determine a winner in this game. You can’t deposit “cool” into the bank.
The Revolution details seem amazing from a game developer prospective, but will it sell? I’m not so sure if it will win the hearts of gamers, just because it is so different. It will absolutely need smash launch titles to avoid quickly dropping from developers’ lists of target systems, especially if you consider that a port from PS3/XboxNext to/from the Revolution would not be as simple as tweaking the game engine, and remapping some buttons. (A Mario game is in the works…) And for Christ’s sake, no more ports of older crap.
Either way, this seems like Nintendo’s end game. I wouldn’t be surprised if this is the last year Nintendo releases a console.